Legal Opinion

Rourke v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1993No. 93-1249PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

The principal issue before us is whether a federal prison inmate must exhaust the Bureau of Prisons’ administrative remedies before he may attempt to secure injunctive relief in federal court. John Francis Rourke challenges the dismissal of his petition by the district court, contending that it erred in requiring such exhaustion. We AFFIRM.

I

Rourke, incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institute in Seagoville, Texas, filed a pro se, in forma pauperis petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, alleging that prison officials denied him adequate medical care and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. Ricardo Gallegos-Hernandez v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Underwood v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Simmat v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Harlan Clement Gibbs 19446039 v. Bureau of Prison OfficeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  5. Tanya Marsh v. Johnnie W. Jones, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API