Legal Opinion

Denton v. Hernandez

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 4, 1992No. 90-1846PublishedCited by 9,914 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

The federal in forma pauperis statute, codified at 28 U. S. C. § 1915, allows an indigent litigant to commence a civil or criminal action in federal court without paying the administrative costs of proceeding with the lawsuit. The statute protects against abuses of this privilege by allowing a district court to dismiss the case “if the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if satisfied that the action is frivolous or malicious.” § 1915(d). In Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U. S. 319 (1989), we considered the standard to be applied when determining whether the legal basis of an in forma pauperis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Boag v. MacDougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9,914 opinions

  1. Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Richard A. LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADIRONDACK BEVERAGE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Northington v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. David Adams v. Nathan A. Rice Gary T. Dixon Hazel W. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

9,909 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API