Simmat v. United States Bureau of Prisons
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
At least since Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104-06, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976), federal courts have recognized the right of prisoners to relief if prison officials deny them basic medical care, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. In the case of state prisoners, the vehicle for such suits is 42 U.S.C. § 1983, with its jurisdictional predicate, 28 U.S.C. § 1343. See Simmat; Hunt v. Uphoff, 199 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir.1999). In the case of federal prisoners, surprisingly, the vehicle is not so clear. In Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 846, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Trackwell v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Jordan v. SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Robinson v. SherrodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Ministerio Roca Solida v. Sharon McKelveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.