Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1979No. 78-1313PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The main thrust of the appellants’ appeal does not urge this court to find that the fair market value of their property is necessarily lower than $120,000. They contend that it is basically unfair that the board of revision, and the courts upon appeal, have adopted the purchase price method of evaluating their property for tax purposes while not requiring the auditor to revalue other surrounding properties on the same basis as theirs was. reappraised. ...

Appellants argue that their real estate has been reappraised and taxed by a different method ■ than utilized for their neighbors, and thence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Koblenz v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State ex rel. Park Investment Co. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kline v. McCloudWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Columbus Board of Education v. Fountain Square Associates, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Murray & Co. Marina, Inc. v. Erie County Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Mountain America, LLC v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API