Legal Opinion

Columbus Board of Education v. Fountain Square Associates, Ltd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1984No. 83-1061PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues that the valuation of appellee’s property set by the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable and unlawful for the reason that it ignores the recent sales price.

R.C. 5713.03 provides, in part:

«* * * jn determining the true value of any tract, lot, or parcel of real estate under this section, if such tract, lot, or parcel has been the subject of an arm’s length sale between a willing seller and a willing buyer within a reasonable length of time, either before or after the tax lien date, the auditor shall consider the sale price of such tract, lot, or parcel to be the true value…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Meyer v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Park Ridge Co. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. HIN, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API