Legal Opinion

Ratner v. Stark County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1986No. 85-737PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The taxpayer argues that the BTA valuation of the mall property is unreasonable and unlawful because it does not reflect fair market value as of January 1, 1981.

This court has held that “[t]he fair market value of property for tax purposes is a question of fact, the determination of which is primarily within the province of the taxing authorities, and this court will not disturb a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals with respect to such valuation unless it affirmatively appears from the record that such decision is unreasonable or unlawful.” Bd. of Revision v. Fodor (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 52…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. Alfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  5. Moran v. Grosse Pointe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Walters v. Knox County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API