Legal Opinion

Koblenz v. Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1966No. Nos. 39414 and 39415PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO ’Neeul, J.

Section 2 of Article XII of the Ohio Constitution provides:

“* * * Land and improvements thereon shall be taxed by uniform rule according to value. * * *”

Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides in part that no state “shall * * * deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

This court held in State, ex rel. Park Investment Co., v. Board of Tax Appeals, 175 Ohio St. 410 (certiorari denied, 379 U. S. 818), at pages 412 and 413:

“It is clear that under the Ohio law all real property, regardless of its nature or use, may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Black v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Meyer v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Park Investment Co. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Boothe Financial Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API