Window Glass Mach. Co. v. Brookville Glass & Tile Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by the Window Glass Machine Company and another against the Brookville Glass & Tile Company. On application to require answers to interrogatories. Objections to interrogatories sustained, and neither party required to answer.
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, District Judge.
This matter 'involves questions arising under equity rule 58 (198 Fed. xxxiv, 115 C. C. A. xxxiv) relating to discovery. Both the plaintiffs and the defendant have filed interrogatories, to be answered by opposite parties, respectively. The interrogatories propounded by the plaintiffs to the defendant were answered by the defendant before the matter was brought to the attention of the court. The plaintiffs have filed what they term are objections to the answers of the defendant. The plaintiffs have not answered the. defendant’s interrogatories, and have filed objections…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- Colgate v. Compagnie Francaise du Telegraphs de Paris a New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
- P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Window Glass Mach. Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Batdorf v. Sattley Coin Handling Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1916
- Marquette Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
- John Wood Mfg. Co. v. Keiner-Williams Stamping Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Bonney Supply Co. v. HeltzelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.