Bonney Supply Co. v. Heltzel
District Court, N.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suit by the Bonney Supply Company Incorporated against John W. Heltzel and the Heltzel Steel Eorm & Iron Company. On motion by defendants for bill of particulars.
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
Complainant’s bill of complaint, after setting up its patent, alleges infringement thereof by the defendants in general language. In substance it says that the defendants have infringed letters patent No. 1,182,081 by making, using, and selling, or leasing, or causing to be made, used, and .sold, or leased, rapid loaders for wagons, embodying the improvements set forth and claimed in complainant’s patent. To this bill defendants file a motion for further and better particulars, as follows: (1) A statement specifying which claim or claims of the patent in suit is or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
- McCoy v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. Braunstein Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
- Marvel Slide Fastener Corp. v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Smith v. Buckeye Incubator Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940
- Beacon Folding Mach. Co. v. Rotary Mach. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
- J. D. Ferry Co. v. Macbeth Engineering Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.