Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1985No. 1788PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

The parties are before this court upon the lower court’s denial of appellant’s petition to compel a second arbitration hearing, involving an automobile accident in which appellant was involved, in pursuance of a claim against a party different than the one he brought suit against in the first arbitration proceedings. Appellant was involved in the automobile accident at an intersection with an identified and insured driver whom appellant averred was the cause of the accident. Subsequently an arbitration panel trying the case between appellant and the identified and insured…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Kelly v. Carborundum Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seay v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Hartzfeld v. Green Glen Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Miller v. Benjamin Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance v. SquiresDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API