Legal Opinion
Pattani v. Keystone Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 29, 1967No. Appeal, 214PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice O’Brien,
Bruce Pattani, appellant, was injured in a collision, which occurred on January 3, 1965, between an auto*334mobile driven by Mm and one driven by Reversa Taylor. Tbe Taylor automobile, at tbe time of tbe accident, was insured by Wissahiekon Mutual Casualty Company, and appellant was insured by appellee, Keystone Insurance Company. Appellant’s policy, written by appellee, contained uninsured motorist coverage, as required by the Act of August 14, 1963, P. L. 909, §1, 40 P.S. §2000.
The statute provides that all automobile liability insurance policies issued within the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrowerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Allstate Insurance Company v. FuscoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
- North River Insurance v. GibsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Federal Insurance Company v. SpeightDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1963
- Levy v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by58 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.