Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Carborundum Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1984No. 262PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In an action by an employee against a third party tortfeasor, may the employer be joined either as an additional defendant or as an involuntary plaintiff for the purpose of apportioning negligence under the Comparative Negligence Act?1 The trial court held that joinder under either procedure was improper. We affirm.

David F. Kelly, an employee of Power Piping Company, was injured when an abrasive grinding wheel attached to a mechanical grinder broke while in use. He and his wife commenced an action in trespass against The Carborundum Company which had designed and manufactured…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Donald Feeley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  3. Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Downey v. WestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Cheryl Harris v. Kellogg Brown & Root ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Carroll v. WhitneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Harka v. NabatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API