Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

*217OPINION

KAUFFMAN, Justice.

Before us is a question of first impression concerning the financial obligations of insurance companies under the No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (“No-Fault Act”).1 At issue is whether a company designated to provide insurance coverage pursuant to the assigned claims plan of the No-Fault Act is required to pay not only “basic loss benefits,” but also uninsured motorist benefits.2

Appellee, Eva Tubner, is administratrix of the estate of Jerry Amey (“decedent”), who died of injuries he received in a motor vehicle accident while a passenger in an uninsured…