Legal Opinion

Amato v. Mercury Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1997No. B088402PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

This case presents a question of the damages recoverable when an insurer breached its duty to defend the insured but ultimately prevailed on the issue of coverage. Because he had no funds to obtain other counsel to defend the underlying lawsuit following the insurer’s refusal to defend, the insured suffered a default judgment against him. In the subsequent lawsuit against the insurer upon the underlying judgment and for breach of the duty to defend, the insurer prevailed on the coverage issue but was found to have wrongfully refused to defend. Upon those…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Blake v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Butcher v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API