Legal Opinion

Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 2000No. A080316PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SWAGER, J.

Two insurance carriers, Northbrook National Insurance Company (Northbrook) and Royal Insurance Company of America (Royal) appeal from a judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages to two insureds, Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc. (IPS) and Shade Foods, Inc. (Shade). We reverse the judgments for punitive damages and modify a portion of the judgment pursuant to the other-insurance clause in the policies but otherwise affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Shade is a wholesale food manufacturer that makes ingredients for larger food product companies.…

2Cases cited102 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. Wilson v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. HMS Capital, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Julian v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API