Legal Opinion

Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2000No. A082472PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, P. J.

Ringler Associates Incorporated (Ringler) appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of respondents Maryland Casualty Company (Maryland) and Northern Insurance Company of New York (Northern). The trial court found that under a “first-publication” exclusion clause contained in a general liability insurance policy respondents had issued to Ringler, respondents had no duty to' defend or indemnify certain defamation claims asserted against Ringler in two underlying lawsuits. On appeal, Ringler contends: (a) the trial court erred in construing the first-publication…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. International Business Machines Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wilbanks v. WolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API