Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. 0504-64153; A128401PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Appellant appeals an involuntary commitment order. ORS 426.130(l)(b)(C). He appeals the commitment on the grounds that the state failed to prove two required conditions: that he is a “mentally ill person,” ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A), and that he would not voluntarily participate in treatment, ORS 426.130(l)(b)(A). On de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we affirm.

We consider the facts about appellant at the time of the commitment hearing on April 11, 2005. Appellant is 60 years old. His marriage to his former wife was dissolved in 1988. His former wife remains in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Matter of LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. WoolridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. BodellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. PuhaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. B. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. A. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API