Legal Opinion

State v. M. R.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 2009No. M060036; A132229PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order adjudicating him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Mental Health Division. ORS 426.130(1)(b)(C). He asserts that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he was a danger to himself or others or was unable to provide for his basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d).1 On de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we reverse.

We review the facts as they existed on the date of the commitment hearing. State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005). On April 19,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. WoolridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. D. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. E.D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API