Legal Opinion

State v. Bodell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 2, 1993No. M-553; CA A72272PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

Appellant appeals from an involuntary commitment order. ORS 426.130. He argues that the trial court erred in finding that he is mentally ill, ORS 426.005(2), and in prohibiting him from purchasing or possessing a firearm. ORS 426.130(l)(b)(D). We review de novo, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), and affirm.

A mental health examiner diagnosed appellant as suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. Appellant believes that he is the Lord and has been chosen to rule the world. Before hospitalization, appellant said that he wanted to “sacrifice” his 11/2-year-old child and told his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. PierettiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. E. J. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API