State v. Puha
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Appellant appeals from an involuntary commitment order. She asserts that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that she had a mental disorder that caused her to be a danger to herself or to be unable to provide for her basic needs. On de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we reverse.
Appellant was almost four months pregnant at the time of her commitment hearing on August 6, 2004. She has a history of mental health issues but lives independently in an apartment. Her adult daughter and her mother live nearby and help her care for herself. Of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. JayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. M. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. M. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. R. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. T. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. B. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.