Legal Opinion
Landres v. Rosasco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1943No. Civ. No. 12556PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant in a suit based upon a property settlement agreement. The plaintiff is the assignee for collection of Thelma Taylor, who was formerly married to defendant.
On June 1, 1939, the then Thelma Rosasco and defendant entered into the property settlement agreement, the meaning of which is in controversy here. On June 7, 1939, Thelma Rosasco secured an interlocutory decree of divorce from defendant. On June 12, 1940, the final decree was entered and Thelma Rosasco remarried on or about August 1, 1940. Up until her remarriage the defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Atlass v. AtlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Henderson v. FieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Rich v. RichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Rosson v. CrellinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.