Atlass v. Atlass
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order purporting to modify a decree of divorce in so far as said decree provided for the payment of alimony by the defendant to plaintiff. The facts are not disputed. Plaintiff had obtained an interlocutory decree which provided that defendant pay to her a certain sum. monthly for a period of two years and a less sum thereafter until further order of the court. A year having elapsed from the entry of the said interlocutory decree, there was duly made and entered the final decree of divorce in which the prior order with reference to alimony and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by32 opinions
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- McHan v. McHanIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.