Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Field

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1940No. Civ. 11387PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This is an appeal from the decree of final distribution entered in the matter of the estate of Charles J. Wilson, deceased, the question involved being whether under the provisions of section 228 of the Probate Code appellants were entitled to one-half of the estate.

Martha Wilson, the decedent’s wife, died in 1920 in Alameda County, intestate and without issue. She was survived by her husband and her mother, Mrs. Enke, a resident of Denmark. Sixteen years later and on November 12, 1936, Charles J. Wilson died in Alameda County, a widower, intestate and without issue, leaving surviving him as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Estate of BournCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. San Francisco Presbyterian Orphanage & Farm v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Estate of NorthcuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Johnston v. LanducciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Herbert's Laurel-Ventura Inc. v. Laurel Ventura Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Bishop v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API