Legal Opinion

Rich v. Rich

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1941No. Civ. 6580PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Don Lake for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J., pro tem.

A property settlement agreement was entered into between respondent and appellant, which contract recited that an action for divorce had been filed by respondent, and that said parties had agreed upon a mutual property settlement of every kind and nature pertaining to property belonging to them, or either of them. After some specific provisions with reference to different properties the agreement provided further:

“Payment of money to first party by second party. Second party does hereby agree to pay to first party the sum of $2400.00, payable $100.00 a month, commencing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Ross v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Callister v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. DuValle v. DuValleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API