Legal Opinion

Rosson v. Crellin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1949No. Civ. 16716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Plaintiff, who was once the wife of defendant, brought this action to recover an amount owing to her under an agreement entered into between the parties while they were husband and wife. Prom a judgment in her favor defendant has appealed.

On or about June 6, 1934, hut under date of June 1, the parties executed a property settlement, agreement for support, and mutual release, and on the same day executed a supplementary agreement dated June 1. At the same time and as a part of the same transaction defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff, who was at that time his wife, a writing dated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Atlass v. AtlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API