Legal Opinion
Charlotte Cuno v. Daimlerchrysler, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 19, 2004No. 01-3960PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs initiated this litigation in state court, challenging the validity of certain state tax credits and local property tax abatements that were granted to DaimlerChrysler Corporation as an inducement to the company to expand its business operations in Toledo, Ohio. They contend that the tax scheme discriminates against interstate commerce by granting preferential treatment to in-state investment and activity, in violation of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause of the Ohio Constitution. After the defendants…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pamela Gilmore v. County of Douglas, State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of TurlockDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Yumin Xiang v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.