Legal Opinion
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 15, 2006No. 04-1704PublishedCited by 2,764 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
Jeeps were first mass-produced in 1941 for the U. S. Army by the Willys-Overland Motor Company in Toledo, Ohio. Nearly 60 years later, the city of Toledo and State of Ohio sought to encourage the current manufacturer of Jeeps— DaimlerChrysler — to expand its Jeep operation in Toledo, by offering local and state tax benefits for new investment. *338Taxpayers in Toledo sued, alleging that their local and state tax burdens were increased by the tax breaks for Daimler-Chrysler, tax breaks that they asserted violated the Commerce Clause. The Court of Appeals agreed that a state tax credit offered…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,764 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
2,759 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.