DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
547 U.S. 332 (2006)
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP. et al.
v.
CUNO et al.
No. 04-1704.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 1, 2006.
Decided May 15, 2006.[*]
Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners in No. 04-1704. With him on the briefs for petitioner Daimler-Chrysler Corporation were Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., David Debold, Matthew D. McGill, Charles A. Rothfeld, Erika Z. Jones, and Miriam R. Nemetz. Douglas R. Cole, State Solicitor of Ohio, argued the cause for petitioners in No. 04-1724. With him on the briefs were Jim Petro, Attorney General, Stephen P. Carney, Senior Deputy Solicitor,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Roberts; Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. PickardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- (PS)Williams v. Amazon.Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Abrigo Castro v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Amir Edwards v. New American Funding, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Anika Smart v. Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.