Legal Opinion
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Turlock
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 3, 2006No. 1:04-cv-05278PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Fed.R.Civ.P.56)
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants the City of Turlock and the Turlock City Council (collectively, “the City”) move for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust (collectively, “Wal-Mart”). Wal-Mart opposes the motion.
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The complaint was filed on February 11, 2004. Doc. 1, Compl. The City moved for summary judgment on March 29, 2005. Doc. 50, Mot. for Summ. J.; Doc. 51, Mem. in Supp. Wal-Mart filed opposition on November 2, 2005.…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- International Franchise Ass'n v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Aiuto v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- American Promotional Events, Inc.—Northwest v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Columbia Pac. Bldg. Trades Council v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.