Jackson v. Peddycoart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MAXEY, C.
Plaintiff in error has filed seven specifications of error. The first proposition that the plaintiff in error urged is that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to strike from the files the plaintiff’s amended petition. This proposition is argued somewhat at length in the brief of plaintiff in error. We are of the opinion that the permitting of amendments is within the discretion of the court. Our statute, Comp. Stat. 1921, section 318, provides:
“The court may, before or after judgment in furtherance of justice, and on such terms as may be proper, amend any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hurley v. AnickerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Helm v. RoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Snyder v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Kershaw v. HurttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baumgart v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. RidleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- McMullen v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- City of Tulsa v. DicksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Toomey v. SpornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.