Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1933No. 21204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Clay F. Dickson and Blanche Dickson, husband and wife, as plaintiffs, recovered a judgment in the district court of Tulsa County, Okla., against the city of Tulsa, Okla., a municipal corporation as defendant, for damages to their property occasioned by the defendant. The defendant appealed, and the parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiffs alleged their real estate had been damaged as the result of the construction of a viaduct along the street upon which their property abutted, and the construction of a fill leading up to the viaduct, in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Potts v. ZolingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. City of Mangum v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. City of Yale v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Jackson v. PeddycoartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. McMullen v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Charles Pfizer & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Baumgart v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Boswell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Oklahoma City v. DrinkwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Oklahoma City v. DrinkwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API