Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Ridley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
A number of errors are assigned and argued in the briefs, but, in our view of the law, it is only necessary to consider one, that of error of the court in refusing to submit to the jury by appropriate instructions the theory of the defense.
The suic was for damages to a carload shipment of cows from Shattuck to Oklahoma City, alleged to have been caused by negligent delay and rough handling in transit.
The defendant, by its answer, joined issue on rhe allegations of negligence and damages and pleaded the terms of the contract between the parties, which was the uniform livestock…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mangum Electric Co. v. BorderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Eccleston v. EdensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Jackson v. PeddycoartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Mills, Rec. v. HollinshedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Justice v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Pate v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Grant v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2022
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.