Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Thraves

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1915No. 3936PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from- District Court, Nowata County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by W. B. Tucker and another against W. V. Thraves. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

On February 1, 1911, W. V. Thraves, defendant, sold to Wm. B. Tucker and E. H. Hess, plaintiffs, the W. % of the N. W. % of the N. W. 1/4, of section 18, township 27 N„, range 15 E., containing 20 acres, more or less, known as the Betsy Sam allotment, and also the N. W. ¥i> of the S. W. *4 and the W. 14 of the S. E. 1/4, of the S. W. 1/4, of section 18, township 27 N., range 15 E., containing 60 acres, known as the Jeanette Boles allotment, for the sum of $6,500. The sum of $100 was in hand paid to bind the contract until the abstracts on said property were brought down…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Tavenner v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tobin v. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API