Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Anicker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1915No. 4498PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by Homer W. Hurley against William J. Anicker. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

On October 17, 1910, the parties to this Suit entered into a contract for the purchase of 200 acres of farming land. By the terms of the contract Hurley was to, and did, pay $2,000 in cash, and was to pay $2,400 in 30 days thereafter, and the balance on January 1, 1911. The contract provided that Anicker was to furnish Hurley with an abstract of title, “which shall, after examination, be returned to him and held by him until all notes or payments under this contract are paid.” On October 22, 1910, Anicker executed a mortgage for $1,800, which covered a portion of the. land…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Brannock v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Pierson v. DorffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Wallace v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API