Legal Opinion

McBarron v. Kimball

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1962No. Civ. 19950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SALSMAN, J.—

Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in a suit to recover an alleged balance due under a contract for the construction of a house.

In November 1956 George 0. Peshel, hereafter referred to as Peshel, a licensed contractor, entered into a contract with defendant for the construction of a house. A few days later Peshel assigned the contract to plaintiffs, also licensed contractors. Plaintiffs and Peshel jointly performed the contract. At trial, defendant’s defense was that plaintiffs and Peshel had acted as joint venturers and did not possess a license to act as such, as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Polk v. PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Cubic Corp. v. MartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Hope v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Steinbrenner v. J. A. Waterbury Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Canfield v. ProdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API