Legal Opinion
Steinbrenner v. J. A. Waterbury Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1963No. Civ. 10362PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Plaintiff sues defendant Waterbury Construction Company and its surety, Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, for the price of certain millwork and cabinets furnished Waterbury as a general contractor. Waterbury having become insolvent, plaintiff’s action was brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1190.1 and 1192.1. In response to counsel’s request a separate hearing was held on the special defense that plaintiff was barred from maintaining the action on the ground that he did not hold a contractor’s license as required by Business and Professions Code section 7031.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Cargill v. AchzigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Costello v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- E. A. Davis & Co. v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Davis Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Industrial Power & Lighting Corp. v. Western Modular Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Harbor Millwork, Inc. v. AchttienCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Pace v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.