Legal Opinion
Canfield v. Prod
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1977No. Civ. 38006PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
Ardythe Canfield appeals from the order denying her petition for a writ of mandate directing respondent, the Director of the Department of Benefit Payments (hereinafter referred to as Director or Department) to set aside his administrative decision denying her claim for attendant care grants under the Aid to the Totally Disabled (ATD) program (formerly Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 13500-13801).
The facts are not in dispute.
Canfield was an ATD recipient from June 1968 through December 1973 because of mental and physical disabilities. As such, she was the recipient of an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Killian v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bib'le v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Social Services Payment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.