Legal Opinion

Loving & Evans v. Blick

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1949No. L. A. 19884PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This case presents for consideration the propriety of a judgment entered upon an arbitration award in compensation of certain contractors for work performed and services rendered under a building contract. The legality of the award is challenged upon the ground that the contractors at all times in question had failed to comply with the state licensing requirements and were therefore not entitled to enforce their claim. An examination of the record shows this point to be well taken, for the award cannot be reconciled with the settled public policy of this state as expressed in our statutory…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API