Legal Opinion
Cubic Corp. v. Marty
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 27, 1986No. D001057PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
William B. Marty, Jr., appeals a judgment awarding Cubic Corporation $34,102 for Marty’s breach of an invention agreement signed when he began his employment with Cubic, awarding the patent to the invention to Cubic and enjoining Marty from exploiting any rights under the patent or using or disclosing Cubic’s confidential information to others.
Facts
When Marty became a Cubic employee in December 1976, he signed an invention and secrecy agreement (hereafter the Agreement) which provided in pertinent part that the employee agreed: “To promptly disclose to Company all ideas,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Pomona College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gutkin v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Applera Corp.-Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.