Liberty Bank v. Ernst
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
An action on a promissory note executed by defendant Ernst to the California Bank of San Mateo and transferred after maturity to the plaintiff.
The answer, which denied that the note was given for value, alleged that the instrument was executed at the request of R J. Falvey, who, as the cashier and manager of the payee bank, by false and fraudulent representations induced the defendant to agree to purchase certain stock in the Nonnenmann Motor Co.; that Falvey agreed to obtain a loan from the payee for the amount of the purchase price of the stock, namely, $1,500, and pursuant to the agreement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- People v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bank of Commerce & Savings v. RandellNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Meyer v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Biddick v. KoblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Douillard v. WooddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Liberty Bank v. NonnenmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Cassidy v. Ohio Public Service Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932