Biddick v. Kobler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. G. G. Clough, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action is prosecuted to quiet title to a small parcel of land claimed by the plaintiff to be a part of lot 3 in block 5 in the town of Crescent Mills, in Plumas county. The complaint is in the usual form.
The premises in controversy are within the townsite of Crescent Mills (an incorporated town), which was surveyed and platted in 1882 upon public lands of the United States, under the provisions of section 2387 of the United States Revised Statutes authorizing the judge of the county court to enter lands settled upon and occupied as a townsite, and for which a patent was issued…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex parte WinstonNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- City of Helena v. AlbertoseMontana Supreme Court · 1889
- Treadway v. WilderNevada Supreme Court · 1872
- Rathbone v. SterlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Lechler v. ChapinNevada Supreme Court · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Douillard v. WooddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Alexander v. Manton Joint Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Liberty Bank v. ErnstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Rose v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Oswald v. COLUMBIA LUMBER COMPANY OF ALASKAAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.