Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Foster
California Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1905No. S.F. No. 3050PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant Gottlob from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action was upon a note in these words:—
“350.00 San Francisco, Oetr. 8, 1895.
“Thirty days after date (without grace) promise to pay to the order of myself three hundred and fifty 00.100 dollars for value received with interest at one (1) per cent per month until paid, both principal and interest payable only in United States gold coin. N. W. Foster.
(Indorsed) “J. J. Gottlob.’.’
The complaint alleges that this note thus indorsed was indorsed by Foster and delivered on the day of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sullivan v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. ForsytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. KulwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Gates v. PendletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Chesney v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Russ v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.