Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Liberty Bank v. Nonnenmann

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1929No. Docket No. 6526PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an action upon two promissory notes in the principal sum of $2,500 each executed by the defendant Elwood Nonnenmann and by his father Charles L. Nonnenmann, since deceased, as makers in favor of the California Bank of San Mateo County, as payee, and transferred after maturity to the plaintiff Liberty Bank. The defendants Elwood Nonnenmann and Emma Adelaide Nonnenmann, as administratrix of the estate of Charles L. Nonnenmann, deceased, filed answers in which they denied the execution of the notes and that there was anything due thereon; that plaintiff acquired the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. First National Bank v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Hyland v. Millers Nat. Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1932
  4. Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API