Legal Opinion

Rarick v. Board of County Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1980No. Nos. 79-798 and 79-799PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues initially that, because the Raricks have been designated as unclassified, the State Personnel Board of Review did not have jurisdiction over appeals from their terminations. However, as this court stated in Yarosh v. Becane (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 5, in paragraph two of the syllabus:

“The State Personnel Board of Review has jurisdiction over appeals from removals of public employees if it determines that such employees are in the classified service, regardless of how they have been designated by their appointing authorities.”

As a consequence of this holding, which applies with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Termination of Employment of PrattOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Yarosh v. BecaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Christophel v. KukulinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Gillivan v. Ohio Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Charlton v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Christophel v. KukulinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API