State ex rel. Gillivan v. Ohio Board of Tax Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
“The writ of mandamus must not be issued when there is plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law,” R.C. 2731.05, and Gillivan attempts to establish this in his fourth proposition of law. In response, Perry and BTA rely on State ex rel. Weiss v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 470, 605 N.E.2d 37, to argue that Gillivan has an adequate remedy and, therefore, cannot show a condition necessary for the writ to issue. We find Weiss dispositive and, therefore, do not reach Gillivan’s remaining arguments.
In Weiss, an allegedly classified civil servant sought a writ of mandamus to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Yarosh v. BecaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Casey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. WitterOhio Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Whitehall ex rel. Wolfe v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Lyons v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.