Legal Opinion
Christophel v. Kukulinsky
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1995No. 94-3831PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOINER, District Judge.
In this procedural due process action, plaintiff Wilma Christophel claims that the University of Cincinnati deprived her of the right to be a classified civil servant, and, consequently, the rights which would have accompanied that status when her employment with the University was terminated. Defendants Nancy Kukulinsky, Joseph Steger and Kathleen Gubser, all University employees allegedly involved in personnel actions affecting Christophel, appeal the denial of their motion for qualified immunity. We conclude that these defendants did not de*482prive Christophel of her…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Samad Salehpour v. University of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Emil Ewolski v. City of BrunswickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Donald Bennett v. City of EastpointeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Turner v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.