State ex rel. Charlton v. Corrigan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The instant'action is one to compel the county treasurer to place his employees within the classified civil service and thus outside the treasurer’s discretion to hire, fire, and promote. The treasurer has objected, asserting that his employees hold either an administrative or fiduciary relationship to him. The statutory authority for this contention is R.C. 124.11(A)(9) which excludes from the classified service, in pertinent part:
“The deputies and assistants of elective * * * officers authorized to act for and in place of their principals, or holding a fiduciary relation to such principals…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Termination of Employment of PrattOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Yarosh v. BecaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Rarick v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MassienOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Baker v. State Personnel Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. SushkaOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Afscme Local 11 v. State Emp. Rel. Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Beery v. Ohio Board of Chiropractic ExaminersOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.