Legal Opinion
Christophel v. Kukulinsky
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1995No. 94-3831PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
61 F.3d 479
102 Ed. Law Rep. 58
Wilma CHRISTOPHEL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Rita Williams, Plaintiff,
v.
Nancy KUKULINSKY, Joseph Steger, and Kathleen Gubser,
Defendants-Appellants,
University of Cincinnati, Academic Pathology Associates,
Inc., and Toni Gregory, Defendants.
No. 94-3831.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued June 6, 1995.
Decided Aug. 3, 1995.
1
Alphonse A. Gerhardstein (argued and briefed), Laufman, Rauh & Gerhardstein, Cincinnati, OH, for Wilma Christophel and Rita Williams.
2
Frank H. Stewart (briefed), Gregory P. Rogers (argued and briefed), Taft, Stettinius & Hollister,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cartwright Ex Rel. Estate of Cartwright v. City of MarineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Bultema v. Benzie CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Preyor v. City of FerndaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway PatrolDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Otero v. WoodDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.