Legal Opinion

Empire Construction, Inc. v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1973No. 45200PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Judge.

This appeal arose out of an action by Appellant [plaintiff] against the Appellee [defendant] for alleged damages to plaintiff’s property on account of a proposed, but unfulfilled, plan to condemn the property for use in the construction, through the defendant City, 'of a system of limited access expressways i known as the “Master Expressway Plan.”

Plaintiff’s first alleged cause of action was in the nature of one for inverse condemnation. Its theory was that the an nounced plan to build the expressway through the property amounted, in effect, to an indirect taking, or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Miller v. Beaver FallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Philadelphia ParkwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Commonwealth's Crosstown Expressway AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lange v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Calhoun v. City of DurantCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Duwa, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API