Legal Opinion
Calhoun v. City of Durant
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 1997No. 85802PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUETTNER, J.
¶ 1 Charles W. and Donna Kay Calhoun (Calhoun) filed an inverse condemnation suit against the City of Durant which was tried to the court in two phases.1 The court fust determined that an inverse condemnation, or taking, had occurred. In the second phase, the court decided the time of the taking and damages. The trial court made extensive *610findings of fact relative to the first issue which are necessary for a complete understanding of the appellate issues. Pertinent findings included the following:
In 1967, the Plaintiff Charles Calhoun entered the Durant real estate…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. BNSF Railway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- G & a LAND, LLC v. City of BrightonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Duwa, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. MehtaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Material Service Corp. v. Rogers County Board of CommissionersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.